Frostpunk

I spent a few hours of the past three days playing Frostpunk. It's a city management game, but with the thematic twist that everything is suddenly freezing over, and people are very distressed by this, so more emphasis is on keeping people alive and away from despair instead of earning money and just building bigger. It's from the same people who made This War of Mine. If you're familiar with that, it might give some insight into the theme of this game. Otherwise, Frostpunk is just a city management game - collect resources, unlock new buildings, try to match your rate of progress with the progressively worsening climate conditions and morale of your people.

What first caught my attention was how beautiful the game looked. I think it really captured the feeling it was going for, as I could feel the cold and hopelessness just from looking at the entire thing. The music also contributed nicely. By the end of my first day of playing, which was about 5 hours, I really liked it, and I was itching to get back and play. Over the next two days my excitement slowly fell, but I remained pretty invested. That is, until I reached the point where I realized they were wrapping things up, the game was going to end, and... that was it. I didn't really feel like starting again, since I had seen pretty much everything, and it would just be more of the same. So, rather abruptly, disappointment hit. But allow me to explain in more detail.

While most city management games have what we'd know as a free-play mode as their main mode, and then maybe some scenarios to show off interesting aspects of their game that might not happen naturally as part of the free-play mode, Frostpunk only has scenarios. And at the time of writing, only a couple, though with more promised to come. But that last bit is irrelevant. There's a problem with scenarios in a game like this. Sure, they may give a very well-tailored experience where all the events have been carefully balanced to keep you on edge, yet not overwhelm you (though it might still be too hard or easy, depending on how well you're doing), but once you're done, you're done. There's no reason to go back, because there are basically no random variables. All the resources, locations, the weather, all the events are pre-scripted. A fair amount of time has been spent on developing these interconnecting mechanics which allow for simulation-like gameplay, and then it's completely hindered by fixing all the things that drive your decisions in place, effectively removing most of the emergent gameplay possibilities. And in this example specifically, if you deviate from that path to play in a different way "this time", you will have a hard time winning.

Overall, for the first playthrough, Frostpunk is a really well made game, and I absolutely loved playing it. The uncertainty of what's to come, if you'll survive, and how, keeps things very interesting. There's constant surprises to knock you off balance just as you feel you're about to regain your metaphorical footing, and the ending is lovely as well. Sadly, the playthrough is short - 12 hours at best, and there is nigh zero replay value after that. You can decide for yourself if the cost is an issue for that much game time, but if it's not, I would in fact recommend playing it. Due to the lack of replayability though, it will not earn a spot in the Hall.