Desperados III

I think I picked up Desperados III due to its highly positive review score. It is apparently the third installment in the series, with previous versions being more than 15 years old. They were made by a different developer, and were very poorly received. But it seems their publisher got the team behind Shadow Tactics to make this one. Now, I played Shadow Tactics more than 7 years ago, but as far as I remember, it's basically the same game, and my thoughts on it are mostly the same. Shadow Tactics was multiple times more popular, but I couldn't say myself if it was because it was better.

Repeating a lot of what I said last time, Desperados III is a real-time tactics game with pausing and stealth. All the mechanics seem fairly standard, with cover, cones of sight, noise circles, stealth kills, hiding bodies, creating distractions, traps, etc. If you're spotted, the situation quickly starts to get worse, but it's still possible to get out of it. That said, it's still a stealth game, and attempting to just storm the enemy is not an option. While there aren't really any novel or interesting mechanics here, everything seems very solidly executed, to the point where I don't have any complaints.
You control 5 characters again, and again, I feel this is where the game falls apart for me. It is quite difficult to keep track of what everyone's doing, and all the enemies who threaten my team. Sure, the game lets you pause at any time, but it kind of doesn't want you to. The design seems more oriented towards controlling everyone at the same time, but that creates for a frustrating experience for me, when characters are not doing what I want them to, because I didn't have the time to manage them properly.

I'm well aware these problems are mostly personal, but I'm not really a fan of neither real-time strategy nor stealth action games, and definitely not a mixture of the two. If you liked Shadow Tactics, then this seems to be literally more of the same. As far as I got into it, it seems very solidly made, and good for what it is. I just don't like what it is, and thus, I can't personally recommend it.